Search for: All records

Background:Achieving optimal glycemic control for persons with diabetes remains difficult. Real-world continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) data can illuminate previously underrecognized glycemic fluctuations. We aimed to characterize glucose trajectories in individuals with Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes, and to examine how baseline glycemic control, CGM usage frequency, and regional differences shape these patterns. Methods:We linked Dexcom CGM data (2015–2020) with Veterans Health Administration electronic health records, identifying 892 Type 1 and 1716 Type 2 diabetes patients. Analyses focused on the first three years of CGM use, encompassing over 2.1 million glucose readings. We explored temporal trends in average daily glucose and time-in-range values. Results:Both Type 1 and Type 2 cohorts exhibited a gradual rise in mean daily glucose over time, although higher CGM usage frequency was associated with lower overall glucose or attenuated increases. Notable weekly patterns emerged: Sundays consistently showed the highest glucose values, whereas Wednesdays tended to have the lowest. Seasonally, glycemic control deteriorated from October to February and rebounded from April to August, with more pronounced fluctuations in the Northeast compared to the Southwest U.S. Conclusions:Our findings underscore the importance of recognizing day-of-week and seasonal glycemic variations in diabetes management. Tailoring interventions to account for these real-world fluctuations may enhance patient engagement, optimize glycemic control, and ultimately improve health outcomes. 

OBJECTIVETo determine the benefit of starting continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in adult-onset type 1 diabetes (T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) with regard to longer-term glucose control and serious clinical events. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODSA retrospective observational cohort study within the Veterans Affairs Health Care System was used to compare glucose control and hypoglycemia- or hyperglycemia-related admission to an emergency room or hospital and all-cause hospitalization between propensity score overlap weighted initiators of CGM and nonusers over 12 months. RESULTSCGM users receiving insulin (n = 5,015 with T1D and n = 15,706 with T2D) and similar numbers of nonusers were identified from 1 January 2015 to 31 December 2020. Declines in HbA1c were significantly greater in CGM users with T1D (−0.26%; 95% CI −0.33, −0.19%) and T2D (−0.35%; 95% CI −0.40, −0.31%) than in nonusers at 12 months. Percentages of patients achieving HbA1c <8 and <9% after 12 months were greater in CGM users. In T1D, CGM initiation was associated with significantly reduced risk of hypoglycemia (hazard ratio [HR] 0.69; 95% CI 0.48, 0.98) and all-cause hospitalization (HR 0.75; 95% CI 0.63, 0.90). In patients with T2D, there was a reduction in risk of hyperglycemia in CGM users (HR 0.87; 95% CI 0.77, 0.99) and all-cause hospitalization (HR 0.89; 95% CI 0.83, 0.97). Several subgroups (based on baseline age, HbA1c, hypoglycemic risk, or follow-up CGM use) had even greater responses. CONCLUSIONSIn a large national cohort, initiation of CGM was associated with sustained improvement in HbA1c in patients with later-onset T1D and patients with T2D using insulin. This was accompanied by a clear pattern of reduced risk of admission to an emergency room or hospital for hypoglycemia or hyperglycemia and of all-cause hospitalization.